NONPF 38th Annual Conference
Advanced Health Assessment in Advanced Practice Nursing Programs: Follow-Up Study
Purpose: To describe teaching and evaluation strategies of AHA courses in graduate nursing degree programs.
Methods: This descriptive, correlational study comprised a mailed survey to a 100% sample of 375 nursing schools with graduate programs; all are members of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The survey comprised 27 questions related to: descriptors of the institution, the APN program, courses, teaching and evaluation strategies, and challenges.
Results: 46% (173) of the nursing school representatives completed the survey. Eighty-three percent (144) of the respondents report having a master’s-level APN program. Virtually all --99% -- of those institutions offer an advanced health assessment course.
Most programs use multiple teaching strategies in the course; those used by more than half of programs include: example videos of AHA techniques (95.1%); faculty demonstrations (93.8%); student return demonstrations (84%); lecture/presentation (78.5%); case-study review (72.9%); group discussions (59.7%); and simulation models (50.7%).
Most programs also use multiple evaluation methods; those used by more than half of the programs include: written exams (95.8%); student return demonstrations (91.7%); lab performance (69.4%); and clinical performance (61.1%).
Conclusions: Most programs use multiple teaching strategies, with most using traditional pedagogical approaches. Nearly one-half use computer-assisted instruction and nearly one-fourth use distance education. Most programs use traditional evaluation methods; with written exams and student return demonstrations being used by more than 90%. Nearly one-fourth (22.2%) of courses require scholarly papers, and 12.5% require group projects. More APN programs are using educational and other technology more than previously. Additional conclusions will also be presented.